- AI feud: How Musk and Altman's partnership turned toxic
- US inflation fight to take time in 'highly uncertain' environment: Fed official
- Ford CEO says Trump policy uncertainty creating chaos
- Dam fine: beavers save Czech treasury $1 million
- Altman says OpenAI 'not for sale' after Musk's $97 bn bid
- Trump says US disaster relief agency should be 'terminated'
- 'Ridiculous and lame': South Africans mock Trump proposals
- JD Vance puts Europe, China on notice at AI summit
- Global stocks mixed as tariff uncertainty looms
- BP pledges strategic 'reset' as profit tumbles
- Gucci owner Kering's annual profit plunges
- Trump signs orders for steel, aluminum tariffs to start March 12
- EU leaders vow 'firm' response to US tariffs
- New Zealand rethinks opposition to deep-sea mining
- World leaders seek elusive AI common ground at Paris summit
- YouTube, the online video powerhouse, turns 20
- Playgrounds come alive again with Brazil school phone ban
- Could a climate megaproject cloud Chile's unparalleled views of universe?
- Trump signs executive orders on steel, aluminum tariffs
- US judges challenge Trump cuts as legal battles mount
- Global stock markets brush off latest Trump tariffs
- Macron vows at summit France to 'deliver' on AI acceleration
- Steel at heart of new Trump trade war
- US federal workers weigh Trump buyout as court to step in
- McDonald's profits dented by food poisoning outbreak
- Almost half of remote French island hit by wildfire: official
- Trump to impose new 25% tariffs on steel, aluminum
- Global stocks markets push higher despite more Trump tariffs
- Nestle share slump adds pressure on new boss
- Spain boss Tome denies 'punishing' Hermoso after forced kiss
- Global stocks rise despite more Trump tariffs
- Nokia names Intel's AI head to replace CEO
- Trump to impose new 25% tariff on US steel, aluminum imports
- Nokia CEO Lundmark to be replaced by Intel AI chief Hotard
- Almost all nations miss UN deadline for new climate targets
- Most Asian markets drop as traders weigh Trump's latest tariff salvo
- Afghan wedding halls light up sombre Kabul nights
- Government chiefs and tech leaders gather in Paris for AI summit
- Trump says will impose 25% tariffs on US steel, aluminum imports
- Trump says Musk will help uncover 'hundreds of billions' in US govt fraud
- Baltic nations 'successfully' link with European power grid
- Iranian schools and offices shut as cold snap bites
- AI app offers a lifeline for S.Africa's abused women
- China inflation picks up after Lunar New Year spending boost
- Record gold prices both boon and burden for London jewellers
- Musk risks putting EU buyers off Tesla: analysts
- Soaring egg prices have US consumers squawking
- Richard Gere calls Trump a 'bully' at Spain's top film awards
- Elon Musk says has no plans to acquire TikTok's US operations
- Baltics disconnect from Russian power grid without incident
US federal workers weigh Trump buyout as court to step in
US federal workers face another deadline Monday to accept a mass buyout from their government jobs as a judge holds a key hearing on whether the offer is legal.
The proposal to two million federal workers is part of an effort by President Donald Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk to drastically cut back on spending that they say will transform the government.
In his first three weeks in office, the president has unleashed a flurry of executive orders aimed at slashing federal spending, appointing SpaceX and Tesla CEO Musk to lead the efforts under the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Trump's sweeping plans have now opened legal battles on several fronts, with lawsuits filed across the country aimed at stopping the Trump initiatives that critics say amount to an illegal power grab.
The Democrats are trying to build momentum against the Trump onslaught on government, and on Monday announced a new portal for whistleblowers to report potential law-breaking by Musk and his associates.
The legal battles intensified Saturday when a US judge blocked Musk's team from accessing Treasury Department data on millions of Americans.
The Trump administration has appealed, calling the order "impermissible" and "unconstitutional."
Musk's team has moved aggressively through federal agencies, freezing aid programs and pushing workforce reductions through legally unclear buyouts or threats of termination.
The Trump administration has effectively shuttered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency long criticized by Republicans as overreaching.
Questions are rife over the buyout, including whether Trump has the legal right to make the offer and whether his administration will honor it.
The plan was first announced on January 28 in an email to much of the vast federal government and titled "Fork in the road" -- the same phrasing as the note Musk sent to employees at Twitter when he bought the social media platform in 2022 and renamed it X.
The original deadline was Thursday, but unions representing more than 800,000 civil servants filed a lawsuit against the offer.
Federal Judge George O'Toole last week said he accepted the case and will hold a first hearing in a Boston courtroom at 2:00 pm (1900 GMT) Monday.
In response, the US Office of Personnel Management, which is run by Musk associates, extended the decision deadline until 11:59 pm.
- 'Not canceled' -
In a post on X, OPM maintain that the program was "NOT blocked or canceled" and the White House urged workers to keep considering "this very generous, once-in-a-lifetime offer."
Last week, US media reported that at least 65,000 federal workers had opted into the so-called deferred resignation program.
This represents some three percent of the roughly two million federal employees who received the offer. The White House has said its target is for between five and 10 percent of employees.
Unions warn that without Congress signing off on the use of federally budgeted money, the agreements may be worthless, especially since current government spending is only agreed until mid-March.
"OPM's Fork Directive is a sweeping and stunningly arbitrary action to solicit blanket resignations of federal workers," wrote lawyers for the unions.
"Defendants have not even argued -- nor could they -- that the Fork Directive was the product of rational or considered decision-making."
M.Anderson--CPN