Coin Press - Iran's Ayatollahs the next to Fall?

NYSE - LSE

RBGPF	100%	68.22	$
GSK	0.57%	38.74	$
SCS	-1.8%	11.1	$
NGG	2.5%	65.57	$
CMSC	-0.13%	22.83	$
BP	-1.62%	33.86	$
BTI	0.17%	40.51	$
RELX	0.18%	50.16	$
RYCEF	0.1%	9.92	$
RIO	-2.15%	61.03	$
JRI	-1.01%	12.87	$
BCE	-0.83%	22.97	$
BCC	-2.1%	98.3	$
CMSD	0.04%	22.71	$
AZN	1.29%	73.79	$
VOD	0.95%	9.45	$

Iran's Ayatollahs the next to Fall?

Following the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria and the ascent of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) to power, questions are emerging about the broader regional impact of this seismic shift. One of the most debated scenarios is whether Iran—long an influential player in Syria—could soon face its own regime-shaking upheaval. Could the Islamic Republic’s Ayatollah be next in line to lose his grip on power?

Iran’s Deep Involvement in Syria
Iran has been a steadfast supporter of the former Assad government, providing military advisors, financing, and strategic counsel. For years, Iranian-backed militias played a critical role in propping up the Syrian regime against a multitude of opposition forces. With Assad’s fall, Tehran finds itself facing a new power structure in Damascus—one led by a group previously hostile to both the regime and its foreign backers.

Reduced Regional Influence
The loss of Assad may weaken Iran’s leverage in the Levant, limiting its ability to exert pressure on neighboring countries. A more extremist government in Damascus could seek to push out or marginalize Iranian influence to consolidate its own standing.

Strategic Setback
Iran’s “Shia Crescent” strategy, which sought to create a corridor of allied governments stretching from Tehran to the Mediterranean, appears severely compromised. This setback may embolden Iran’s adversaries at home and abroad, fueling the notion that Tehran’s regime could be similarly vulnerable.

Domestic Pressures in Iran
Even before events in Syria escalated, Iran’s leadership faced growing internal discontent. Public frustration with economic hardships, alleged corruption, and strict social controls has been an undercurrent for years, occasionally erupting into protests.

Economic Challenges
International sanctions have strained Iran’s economy. Unemployment and inflation add to widespread dissatisfaction, weakening the regime’s domestic legitimacy.

Protest Movements
Periodic demonstrations, sometimes met with harsh crackdowns, reveal a restive population demanding reforms. Younger Iranians, especially urban and educated demographics, often use social media to organize protests and call for greater freedoms.

Leadership Questions
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s advanced age has sparked debates about succession. Hardline factions and moderate reformists remain divided, raising the possibility of political instability if the supreme leader’s authority wavers.

Could HTS’s Victory Inspire Iranian Opposition?
The question many observers are asking: if a once-fringe, hardline group like HTS can topple a long-entrenched regime in Syria, might Iran’s leadership be more vulnerable than it appears?

Symbolic Resonance
Zhe collapse of Assad—a key ally—damages Tehran’s image of regional ascendancy. Opposition groups in Iran may see HTS’s triumph as a sign that even the most entrenched regimes can crumble under the right conditions.

Geopolitical Shifts
Regional players opposed to Iran’s influence may feel emboldened and offer covert support to Iranian dissidents. A shift in Damascus could reduce Tehran’s ability to move personnel, weapons, or resources across Syria, weakening its strategic depth.

Counterarguments: Why Iran May Weather the Storm
Despite these challenges, it is far from certain that Iran’s leadership is on the brink. The Islamic Republic has shown resilience over four decades, surviving international sanctions, internal protests, and regional conflicts.

Security Apparatus
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) remains a potent force, adept at suppressing unrest. A widespread intelligence network monitors opposition activities, often preventing them from gaining traction.

Ideological Cohesion
Many Iranians still identify with the Islamic Republic’s revolutionary ideals. The regime’s ability to rally nationalist sentiment, especially in times of perceived foreign threats, should not be underestimated.

Lack of a Unified Opposition
Multiple opposition groups inside and outside Iran remain fractured, lacking a coherent leadership to mount a credible challenge. HTS’s ascension in Syria may not easily translate into a similar movement within Iran.

Conclusion: A Cautious Outlook
While the unexpected rise of HTS in Syria has undoubtedly rattled long-standing alliances, it is premature to conclude that Iran’s Ayatollah is next in line to lose power. Tehran’s regime, though facing economic challenges and public dissent, still possesses formidable tools of control and a legacy of resilience.

Yet the region’s shifting geopolitics, coupled with growing discontent at home, suggests that Iran’s leadership must navigate increasingly turbulent waters. If the aftermath of Syria’s transformation continues to erode Tehran’s regional standing, domestic opposition could be emboldened—setting the stage for potential change. Whether that will translate into a full-scale power shift remains uncertain, but the seeds of doubt are undeniably taking root.

EU Pledges €800 Billion for Defence to Deter Russia

Israel escalates War to crush Hamas

Trump, Putin and the question: What now?

Canada challenges Trump on Tariffs

Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

Rebellion against Trump: "Ready for War?"

Ukraine: Problem with the ceasefire?

Ukraine Loses Kursk: A Collapse?

Russia's "Alliance" in the Balkans is sinking

US Federal Reserve with “announcement”

Germany doesn't want any more migrants?

Wealth that Brazil is not utilizing!

Featured

Stargate project, Trump and the AI war...

In a dramatic return to the global political stage, former President Donald J. Trump, as the current 47th President of the United States of America, has unveiled his latest initiative, the so-called ‘Stargate Project,’ in a bid to cement the United States’ dominance in artificial intelligence and outpace China’s meteoric rise in the field. The newly announced programme, cloaked in patriotic rhetoric and ambitious targets, is already stirring intense debate over the future of technological competition between the world’s two largest economies.According to preliminary statements from Trump’s team, the Stargate Project will consolidate the efforts of leading American tech conglomerates, defence contractors, and research universities under a centralised framework. The former president, who has long championed American exceptionalism, claims this approach will provide the United States with a decisive advantage, enabling rapid breakthroughs in cutting-edge AI applications ranging from military strategy to commercial innovation.“America must remain the global leader in technology—no ifs, no buts,” Trump declared at a recent press conference. “China has been trying to surpass us in AI, but with this new project, we will make sure the future remains ours.”Details regarding funding and governance remain scarce, but early indications suggest the initiative will rely heavily on public-private partnerships, tax incentives for research and development, and collaboration with high-profile venture capital firms. Skeptics, however, warn that the endeavour could fan the flames of an increasingly militarised AI race, raising ethical concerns about surveillance, automation of warfare, and data privacy. Critics also question whether the initiative can deliver on its lofty promises, especially in the face of existing economic and geopolitical pressures.Yet for its supporters, the Stargate Project serves as a rallying cry for renewed American leadership and an antidote to worries over China’s technological ascendancy. Proponents argue that accelerating AI research is paramount if the United States wishes to preserve not just military supremacy, but also the economic and cultural influence that has typified its global role for decades.Whether this bold project will succeed—or if it will devolve into a symbolic gesture—remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that the Stargate Project has already reignited debate about how best to safeguard America’s strategic future and maintain the balance of power in the fast-evolving arena of artificial intelligence.

Truth: The end of the ‘Roman Empire’

The fall of the Roman Empire in the fifth century AD has long captivated historians and the public alike. For centuries, scholars have debated the precise causes of the Empire’s decline, offering myriad explanations—ranging from political corruption and economic instability to moral degeneration and barbarian invasions. Yet despite the passage of time and the wealth of research available, there remains no single, universally accepted answer to the question: why did the Roman Empire truly collapse?A central factor often cited is political fragmentation. As the Empire grew too vast to govern effectively from one centre, Emperor Diocletian introduced the Tetrarchy—a system dividing the realm into eastern and western halves. While initially intended to provide administrative efficiency, this division ultimately paved the way for competing centres of power and weakened the unity that had long defined Roman rule. Frequent changes of leadership and civil wars further sapped the state’s coherence, undermining confidence in the imperial regime.Economics played an equally crucial role. Burdened by expensive military campaigns to protect ever-extending frontiers, the Empire resorted to debasing its currency, provoking rampant inflation and eroding public trust. The resulting fiscal strains fuelled social unrest, as high taxes weighed heavily upon small farmers and urban dwellers alike. Coupled with declining trade routes and resource depletion, these pressures contributed to a persistent sense of crisis.Compounding these challenges was the growing threat from beyond Rome’s borders. Germanic tribes such as the Visigoths, Vandals, and Ostrogoths gradually eroded the Western Empire’s defensive capabilities. While earlier Roman armies proved formidable, internal discord had dulled their edge, allowing external forces to breach once-impenetrable frontiers.Modern historians emphasise that the Empire did not fall solely because of barbarian invasions, moral decay, or fiscal collapse; instead, its downfall was the outcome of a confluence of factors, each interacting with the other. The story of Rome’s fall thus serves as a stark reminder that even the mightiest of civilisations can succumb to the inexorable weight of political, economic, and social upheaval.

China Targets Dollar at US Critical Moment

China has intensified its financial offensive against the United States, deploying significant measures to undermine the dominance of the US dollar at a time when America faces mounting economic and geopolitical challenges. Reports indicate that the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has directed major state-owned banks to prepare for large-scale interventions in offshore markets, selling dollars to bolster the yuan. This move, seen as a direct challenge to the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency, coincides with heightened US vulnerabilities, including domestic political instability and a ballooning national debt nearing $35 trillion.The strategy builds on years of Chinese efforts to internationalise the yuan and reduce reliance on the dollar. Since 2022, China has accelerated dollar sell-offs, with Reuters noting similar directives from the PBOC in October of that year amid a weakening yuan. More recently, Beijing has leveraged its position as a key holder of US Treasury securities—still over $800 billion despite gradual reductions—to exert pressure. Analysts suggest that China aims to exploit the US’s current economic fragility, exacerbated by inflation and supply chain disruptions, to advance its long-term goal of reshaping global financial power.Russia’s alignment with China has further amplified this campaign, with both nations increasing trade in non-dollar currencies. In 2023, yuan transactions surpassed dollar-based exchanges in Sino-Russian trade, a trend that has only deepened. Meanwhile, whispers of more aggressive tactics persist, including unverified claims of plans to confiscate US assets within China, encompassing government, corporate, and individual investments. While such measures remain speculative, they reflect the growing audacity of Beijing’s financial warfare.The timing is critical. The US faces a contentious election cycle and a Federal Reserve grappling with interest rate dilemmas, leaving the dollar exposed. China’s actions also resonate within the BRICS bloc (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), which has openly discussed de-dollarisation, with proposals for a unified currency gaining traction at recent summits. If successful, this could erode the dollar’s global hegemony, a cornerstone of American economic influence since the Bretton Woods agreement of 1944.Yet, China’s gambit carries risks. Flooding markets with dollars could destabilise its own economy, heavily reliant on export surpluses tied to dollar-based trade. Moreover, the US retains significant retaliatory tools, including sanctions and control over the SWIFT financial system. For now, Beijing’s “big guns” signal intent more than immediate triumph, but the message is clear: China sees this as America’s moment of weakness—and its opportunity to strike.