-
Scientists explain why Myanmar quake was so deadly
-
French chefs quake as Michelin prepares new guide
-
Mike Leigh on the 'hard truths' of film, happiness and World War III
-
UK dreams of US trade deal before Trump tariffs
-
Partial solar eclipse to cross swathe of Northern Hemisphere
-
'Defiant' Canada autoworkers vow to fight tariff layoffs
-
Performance, museums, history: Trump's cultural power grab
-
Elon Musk says xAI startup buying X platform
-
Global markets slide as fears over US tariffs intensify
-
Vance says Denmark has 'under invested' in Greenland
-
Record fine for UK university renews free speech row
-
French lawyers condemn 'sexism' of Depardieu's defence in abuse trial
-
Stock markets slide over US inflation, tariff fears
-
Vance lands in Greenland as anger mounts over Trump takeover bid
-
US 'in arrears' at the WTO
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge shows some cause for concern
-
Germany says 'nothing off table' in US tariff row
-
Clouds and conspiracies: concerns over push to make rain
-
Stock markets drop as autos suffer more tariff-fuelled losses
-
No 'spring revival' for Germany as unemployment rises
-
Pilgrim walks across Bosnia to help heal the lasting wounds of war
-
Asian markets sink as autos suffer more tariff-fuelled losses
-
Rain offers respite to South Korea firefighters as death toll rises
-
Japan PM says Trump's tariff views hard to understand
-
Rubio vows to keep stripping visas after furor over snatched student
-
Rain gives some respite to South Korea firefighters as death toll rises
-
The UK car loan scandal that could cost banks billions
-
'My entire life': Saudi tailor keeps robe-making craft alive
-
Regulator clears Qatar Airways-Virgin Australia alliance
-
Trump administration expands university DEI probes to California
-
Maradona died 'in agony,' forensic expert tells court
-
US judge orders Trump admin to save 'Signalgate' chat
-
Autos lead market losses after Trump unveils sharp tariffs
-
Rubio warns Venezuela of force if it attacks oil-rich Guyana
-
Era of close ties with US 'is over': Canada PM Carney
-
US auto industry stunned by tariffs meant to save it
-
Why has Mexico's water debt opened new battle line with US?
-
Argentina seeking $20 billion IMF loan
-
Space telescope Gaia sent into 'retirement' but legacy endures
-
BBC launches survey on its future ahead of funding review
-
Walmart to invest billions in Mexico despite US tariff threat
-
Autos lead market losses after Trump tariffs
-
Prosecutors ask for 18-months suspended jail for French actor Depardieu
-
Crisis-hit German rail operator reports another massive loss
-
Star-mapping space telescope Gaia sent into 'retirement orbit'
-
Tariff-hit British Steel confirms plan to shut blast furnaces
-
Nigeria, Sahel militants embrace DIY drone warfare
-
Hundreds of fungi species threatened with extinction: IUCN
-
Tariff-hit British Steel confirms furnace closures
-
Macron hosts Europe's 'coalition of willing' to protect Ukraine
Who wins and who loses in Syria?
In a dramatic turning point for Syria, the Assad regime has collapsed, paving the way for Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) to seize the reins of power. This profound shift comes after years of civil war, international intervention, and internal political struggles. While the fall of one government and the rise of another might briefly end large-scale hostilities in certain areas, the implications for Syrians—and regional players—are complex and far-reaching. Below, we examine who stands to benefit from HTS’s ascension and who may face serious setbacks in the aftermath.
Potential Winners
1) Hardline Islamist Groups and Affiliates
As HTS consolidates its influence, other aligned Islamist factions may find opportunities to share in governing structures or expand their influence in regions of Syria. Local militias cooperating with HTS may receive political or financial rewards, as well as a certain degree of autonomy in the territories they help control.
2) Foreign Backers of HTS
Certain external supporters might see political or strategic advantages if their preferred groups are now in charge. These backers could influence the formation of new governmental institutions, policies, or trade agreements favorable to their interests.
3) Some Local Communities Under HTS Control
In areas where HTS had already established local governance—providing basic services and a semblance of stability—residents might see a continuation of order, albeit under strict regulations. While personal freedoms may be curbed, some communities might prefer an end to intense fighting over the chaos of ongoing armed conflict.
Potential Losers
4) Moderate Opposition Groups
Non-extremist factions that fought to topple the Assad regime could be sidelined, if not outright suppressed, by the new leadership. Political competition might be stifled, making it difficult for moderate voices to participate in post-conflict governance.
5) Ethnic and Religious Minorities
With HTS widely considered a hardline faction, minority groups—such as Alawites, Christians, Kurds, and Druze—may face persecution or exclusion from the new power structure. Discriminatory policies could lead to displacement, especially in regions already experiencing sectarian tension.
6) Civil Society and Human Rights Advocates
NGOs, independent journalists, and activists critical of HTS’s ideology may be forced to operate clandestinely or face severe repercussions. Freedom of the press, speech, and assembly could be further curtailed, limiting any meaningful civic engagement.
7) International Humanitarian Efforts
Foreign aid agencies may find it more difficult to operate under a leadership that has been labeled “extremist” by many nations. Bureaucratic hurdles, security risks, and ideological disputes may restrict the distribution of crucial humanitarian assistance to vulnerable populations.
International Dynamics
Regional Powers:
Neighboring countries that once supported specific rebel factions might find their influence diminished if those groups lose ground under HTS rule. Conversely, regional actors that developed covert ties with HTS might gain a stronger foothold in Syria’s evolving political landscape.
Global Powers:
Western nations could face a dilemma: accept a de facto extremist-led government for the sake of stability, or maintain sanctions and diplomatic isolation. Rivalries between larger international players—such as the United States, Russia, and Iran—may shift as each decides how (or whether) to engage with HTS.
Humanitarian Concerns:
While HTS’s political agenda may bring an end to certain forms of internal conflict, Syria still faces severe humanitarian challenges. Millions are displaced, infrastructure is in ruins, and the economy remains fragile. Aid agencies worry that severely restrictive policies or ideological conditions set by the new authorities could hamper reconstruction and limit aid distribution, prolonging the suffering of ordinary Syrians.
Looking Ahead
The end of the Assad regime and the rise of HTS marks a new chapter in Syria’s ongoing struggle. For some, the new government provides a semblance of order after years of civil war. For others, it heralds tighter social controls, greater risk of persecution, and an uncertain future. How HTS manages governance, minority rights, and international relations will ultimately shape Syria’s recovery or further turmoil.
As the global community watches from afar, Syrians remain on the front lines of this dramatic power shift—some hoping for a break from ceaseless conflict, others bracing for a new and possibly harsher form of authoritarian rule. Only time will tell if HTS can stabilize the country and address the nation’s myriad challenges, or if Syria’s years of turmoil will persist under a different banner.

EU Pledges €800 Billion for Defence to Deter Russia

Israel escalates War to crush Hamas

Trump, Putin and the question: What now?

Canada challenges Trump on Tariffs

Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

Rebellion against Trump: "Ready for War?"

Ukraine: Problem with the ceasefire?

Ukraine Loses Kursk: A Collapse?

Russia's "Alliance" in the Balkans is sinking

US Federal Reserve with “announcement”

Germany doesn't want any more migrants?
